The Diplocat
Pax Blog Library Support

Comparison

The five fake apologies — and what each one actually says

Pax

Pax

May 9, 2026 · 2 min read

Five phrases that look like apologies and function like deflections — what people say, what the recipient actually hears, and why each one fails. Harriet Lerner catalogs all five in Why Won’t You Apologize?.

The Deflection

The phrase: “I’m sorry you feel that way.”

What the recipient hears: The problem here is that you’re hurt, not that I did something.

Why it fails: The sentence apologizes for how the other person feels, not for what caused those feelings. Nothing the speaker did is acknowledged.

Related: Why “I’m sorry you feel that way” isn’t a real apology.

The Explanation

The phrase: “I’m sorry, but you have to understand…”

What the recipient hears: I had reasons — your hurt is disproportionate.

Why it fails: Once “but” arrives, the apology has ended and the defense has started. The hurt person has been recruited into the speaker’s case instead of receiving repair.

Related: Why “I’m sorry, but…” isn’t a real apology.

The Minimizer

The phrase: “I’m sorry if that bothered you.”

What the recipient hears: First, prove you were hurt.

Why it fails: An apology acknowledges that something happened. “If” introduces the possibility that nothing happened. One cancels the other.

Related: Why “I’m sorry if” isn’t a real apology.

The Performer

The phrase: “I’m SO sorry, I’m the WORST, I can’t believe I did that.”

What the recipient hears: Tell me I’m not a bad person.

Why it fails: The apologizer has made themselves the subject. What was meant to center the hurt person now requires them to respond to the apologizer’s distress, often before anyone has addressed the harm.

The Hostage

The phrase: “I said I’m sorry. What more do you want?”

What the recipient hears: You’re being unreasonable.

Why it fails: The apology is being used as a closing statement. The word was spoken, so the matter is settled. Any hurt that remains is the other person’s problem. It doesn’t invite repair; it sets a deadline for the other person to stop hurting.


The pattern underneath all five: the apologizer’s discomfort is being managed before — or instead of — the hurt person’s. That’s the inversion the four-part framework is designed to correct.

Related: How to give a real apology that actually works

From the essay: Read the full piece →

Want more like this? Subscribe to the newsletter.

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback!

Home Meet Pax Blog Library Privacy Policy Terms of Service Support

© 2026 Entelechy Unbound, LLC. All rights reserved.

Made with diplomacy